Synopsis
First-person narration, for all its immediacy and power, becomes a liability if your reader can't identify with your narrator. Discover Chuck's secret method for making a first-person narrator less obtrusive. Bonus: This essay includes the story 'Guts.'
This content is for Workshop Members only. But don't despair! Click Here to upgrade your Membership and get these exclusive Craft Essays, not found anywhere else online!
Comments
Being a member of this thematical forum is a great news. Especially when you are trying to work in the sphere of business plan writing. Personally for me it matters a lot. What is more, I work in peculair area of a affordable business plan writing services so I am glad that I can share and ask for advice as well.
Thank you for this helpful information. I also got one useful website, where you can use for your resume writing. Contact me to get more info.
I have been flirtling with first person for a few months. I have avoided like the plague. I am tired now of the godly voice. First person is calling to me. I really like this essay as an opening for me to overcome the resistance. I have just used "I" seven times. Can I (8) hide it?
After flirting with first person for a few months, having avoided it like the plague all of my writing life, this writer is tired of that godly voice ringing in my head. This essay opens a door that has been closed fo a long time. Thanks. I am grateful. gsr
In reply to Bradley (and if there's some better way to reply to comments, please tell me. I'm new here):
I think he's referring to Nick "killing" Gatsby in his story. Since Nick is the narrator, he can "kill" whoever he wants in the story, just like George RR Martin "kills" his characters. Then again, I might be wrong. Palahniuk could have screwed up, but I kind of doubt he could screw up something that obvious. This essay must have gone through plenty of revisions and rewrites. It's too blatant to be unintentional. Hopefully.
Submerging the I seems similar to advice such as "avoid adverbs" and "avoid passive voice". These are good rules to live by but also dangerous if adhered to dogmatically. But even so, raising awareness of the issue is helpful (I never thought about this until this essay was pointed out to me by a friend)
Without trying to discount anything written, I happen to just have a copy of Survivor next to me at the moment (a book I've bought three or four times now because I love it so much and keep lending it to people that never return it) but "I" appears in the fourth sentence. It goes on to pretty quickly establish that the whole book is told from the narrator's point of view and the whole story is about him.
Maybe this was an earlier work, but I still think it works perfectly well and I love the book. That being said, I'll definitely be trying to submerge the I and see what happens.
There are two rules to live by when you get advice from other writers. No matter how talented or talentless they are:
1) Hold your own opinion.
2) Regardless of that opinion, make an experiment of applying their advice.
This article itched against my nerves, largely because the narrator of my current novel doesn't "submerge the I" much. It's never fun to hear that your novel qualifies as one of your favorite author's "personal demons." And the voices in my head quickly assured me that my narrator's use of "I" was part of his characteristic voice, that the use of repeating I's reflected common speech. Etc.
Then the experimental workshopping started. As each sentence was re-cast to match this article's suggestion, the truth was difficult to ignore (or admit): The sentences became stronger. My nerves still itch at the notion that submerging the I is always a good idea, but this process definitely strengthened my text in notable ways.
That was a kickass essay! As for the story, let's just say I petrified by both horror and fascination.
That was my first time reading "Guts." Now I have to go downstairs and spend Easter weekend with my grandmother. Thanks.
Great article. Maybe I missed the point. I usually do, but I got focused on wondering how the candle-kid's piss blood smelled? Did it smell like the fine scent of the candle?
I'm a bit confused about what this means considering Nick doesn't murder Gatsby. Geoge Wilson did it:
"Does Nick make Jay wonderful and then kill him so that Nick’s own chickenshit retreat to his Midwest family seems justified?
Perhaps the "killing" is in reference to Nick referring to Gatsby as an awesome guy throughout most of the novel while I think he ends up thinking of him as pathetic by its end.