Columns > Published on August 2nd, 2012

5 More Ways Your Brain Sabotages Your Writing... And What To Do About It

Last month, we looked at five sneaky ways your mind messes with your productivity as a writer. I’d love to tell you that those are the only psychological tricks and cognitive distortions your brain has up its sleeve, but I can’t. Because there are five more where those came from, and also because your brain does not have sleeves. Let’s take a look at what else our writing practices are up against…

 

Information Addiction

Your brain says: “Follow every interesting link. It’s not wasting time. It’s research!”
The reality: You’ll keep reading and researching long after you have the information you need to write your story.

You need to drown a character in this chapter, but how are you supposed to do that if you’ve never actually seen anyone drown? Should the character flail? Scream? Gurgle? Spew blood out her ears? You’d better check. You want it to be accurate, right? Enter the internet and its infinite supply of useful and useless information. Two clicks and you’ve got your answer: Drowning people don't yell, don't flail, bob vertically in the water, and grasp the surface as if it were a ladder. Got it. “But wait, what’s this link? Oh, that’s fascinating…” An hour later, you’re reading about “very rough” shark sex on the London Review Of Books. There are not even any sharks in your story, much less a shark sex scene. How did you get there? Your irksome brain is to blame.

Remember when you’d go to the arcade, play skee-ball and whack-a-mole to win tickets, then trade the tickets for year-old bubble gum and enormous stuffed monkeys? Your brain’s dopamine system works in a similar way, except instead of paper tickets, you seek out food, sex, and drugs. And instead of stale chewing gum, you redeem your haul for rushes of pleasurable brain chemicals. But here’s the interesting part: Scientists have discovered that our internal prize center also rewards us for seeking new information. That means surfing around the web discovering surprising facts about fish is triggering the same kind of feel-good brain juice as sex, food, and drugs do. And that, my friend, is how you ended up reading about shark S&M at 1 am.

Solutions:

  • This one is—as Chicago would say—a hard habit to break. After all, you are up against the same chemical system that causes cocaine addiction. For starters, remember that if you don’t start down the rabbit hole, you can’t fall down the rabbit hole, so don’t interrupt your writing to look up trivial facts. If your story features a grain silo, don’t stop to see how tall grain silos are on average (30 to 275 feet, for the record). Just make a note to look it up later and keep going.
  • If you do need to stop writing to research something, write down the specific question you are trying to answer before you even open your web browser or head to the library. Once you’ve found the answer, write it down underneath the question then stop reading. Job well done.
  • Step 1 - Give yourself ten minutes to find the information you need. Step 2 - Set a timer. Step 3 - (Optional) Give someone you love a rubber mallet and instruct them to crush your fingers if you go over time

 

Restraint Bias

Your brain says: “Today, you are a rock. Nothing short of a dubstep marching band led by a lingerie-clad Mila Kunis will distract you from your writing.”
The reality: People who are most confident in their ability to resist temptation are often the most impulsive.

Restraint Bias tricks your silly brain into thinking that you are an unbending pillar of willpower and focus. What could be wrong with that? Well, the easier you think it is to control urges, the more likely you are to put yourself into situations where temptation beckons. The more often you’re in those situations, the more often you succumb to temptation. “You,” Restraint Bias whispers seductively, “are capable of withstanding any pressure, so why sit at this boring desk and work? Take your laptop to the pool and write while your friends float around on inflatable ducks and sip cocktails.” You don’t need me to tell you how that story ends; just remember how “unsinkable” the Titanic was.

So while you’re bragging about your willpower and pumping up your blowup pool toy, another writer—who disabled his Wi-Fi because he didn't trust himself not to spend the day reading about the mating rituals of ocean predators—has churned out 5,000 words.

Solutions:

  • Use common sense. If you were trying to kick a weed habit, you wouldn’t go on tour with Snoop Dogg. So if you’re writing a story, have the good sense not to sit in the living room where your roommates are playing Xbox.
  • Determine your specific temptations and distractions then decide in advance how to handle them. For example: “If I’m tempted to wander to the coffee shop for a break, I will instead go to the kitchen and brew coffee because it will take less time.” Studies show that planning scenarios like this can double or triple your success rate.
  • If the delights of the interwebs are the problem, try tools like LeechBlock or RescueTime to block distractions. You can also track exactly how you’re spending your time, which is horrifying.

 

Self-Handicapping

Your brain says: “Sure, you failed this time, but it’s not your fault.”
The reality: You set yourself up to fail to protect your delicate self-esteem.

Imagine there’s a half-marathon for wombats coming up. (Why? Because they’re cuter than human athletes, and I don’t think they can handle a full marathon.) Alan trained hard every day and cut back on berries in preparation for the race. Bruce, an experienced runner, didn’t train much but did get a good night’s sleep in the den before race day. Carl figures he’ll do pretty well, so he goes out until 4am the night before the event and gets absolutely wasted on tree bark or meth or whatever it is that wombats use for party-time. The race happens. It is predictably adorable. Bruce wins with his natural talent and good night’s sleep. Alan’s weeks of hard work earn him second place. And hungover Carl comes in dead last.

Who feels the worst? Alan. Even though he beat hungover Carl, Alan knows in his little wombat heart that he gave it his absolute best and still didn’t win. There’s nothing worse than knowing that your best isn’t good enough. Carl, on the other hand, tells himself and his buddies that he could have won if not for that gnarly hangover. It’s not that he lacks the skill to win, he says, he was just out too late.

That pre-race partying Carl did is called self-handicapping, and writers do it too. Maybe you threw something together at the last minute for July’s LitReactor horror challenge and got some negative feedback on your story. But that's okay because if you’d spent more time on it, you would’ve crushed the competition, right? Self-handicapping protects our egos and keeps our self-esteem intact. Our fear of failure wants to make sure we have a valid excuse anytime things head South, so the less confident you are about a given situation, the more likely you are to self-handicap. That way, if you don’t perform well, you can blame the circumstances rather than your lack of ability. And if you manage to succeed anyway…well, you’re just a rock star, aren’t you? It’s a win-win.

But here’s the problem with setting yourself up to fail: You fail. Years from now, do you want to be the guy talking about how he coulda been a contender or the guy with a case full of trophies?

Solutions:

  • Not to get all 12-step on you, but start by admitting you have problem. You almost certainly self-handicap, you just need to figure out how often. Here’s the plan: For two weeks, make a daily list of goals. It should look like this:
Goal Deadline Ideal Outcome Result
Turn in article to editor Friday No major rewrites Missed deadline. Because my loud upstairs neighbor distracted me  ←Self-handicapping!
Because I decided to try to work at the pool instead of asking my neighbor to tone it down.

 

  • The first three columns are straightforward. In the fourth, put a drawing of a smiling wombat (a checkmark if you insist on being boring) in the box if you hit the goal OR give the reason you didn’t. If, at the end of the two weeks, Column 4 is full of external factors: sick pets, bad traffic, dinner party commitments, etc., you’ve probably got a pretty serious self-handicapping habit. It sounds cheesy, but the saying “If it’s important, you’ll find a way. If not, you’ll find an excuse” really does apply to your writing goals. Prioritize. Are the excuses you listed more important to you than your writing? If so, carry on but don't expect that novel to finish itself. If not...
  • Try again with the chart. This time, no lame excuses in Column 4! Start each line with: “I didn’t hit my goal because I chose to…” (Look, no one said this was going to be pretty. You are self-handicapping because you’re afraid of failure. Facing that is like facing any fear... scary.) If you’re honest enough, your new Column 4 will show you what you’re doing to get in the way of your own success. Adjust accordingly.
  • Sometimes, you’ll hit your deadline but not your ideal outcome. When that happens, take an honest look at your goals to make sure they’re reasonable. Setting wildly unrealistic goals is another form of self-handicapping.

 

Parkinson’s Law (aka The Excess Time Effect)

Your brain says: “You don’t need no stinkin’ deadline.”
The reality: Give yourself forever to write that novel and it will take you forever to write that novel.

Parkinson’s Law states that “work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion.” Cyril Northcote Parkinson was a British historian and author, not a psychologist, and his 1955 “law” was intended as a satire on the bloated nature of bureaucracies. But in the years since, the concept has been substantiated by social psychologists and procrastinators the world over.

In other words, give yourself two hours to write 500 words and you will fill those two hours doing extra research, giving in to distraction, feeling anxious about finishing, watching marshmallow Peeps and Ivory soap expand in the microwave to metaphorically illustrate the expansive nature of the project, and finally writing a little. Give yourself 20 minutes for the same task and you’ll sit down and start pushing out the words. Because you have to.

Solutions:

  • Set reasonable writing deadlines (easier said than done, see last month’s section on Planning Fallacy solutions for tips on that) and create consequences if you fail. Need help? An online tool called Aherk!, a “goal-oriented self-blackmailing service,” will post a compromising photo of you on Facebook if you fail to meet your goals. Unless you’re a super slutty exhibitionist, it may help.

 

Myth of Multi-tasking

Your brain says: “The more things you do at once, the more you’ll get done today.”
The reality: Your brain does one thing at a time, so all that chopping and changing you’re doing is killing your productivity.

Are you at work? Stop and count how many things you’re trying to do simultaneously right now…all of them: reading tweets as they pop up, responding to texts, plotting a casino heist, reading this article, answering phones, checking email, playing music, keeping up with the Olympics in the corner of your screen, writing, drinking coffee, petting your cat, stressing about bills, getting drunk, talking to a coworker, whatever. Count them.

How many? If your answer is more than one, that’s a problem. You might think you’re kicking ass like a boss, but your brain is tricking you again. You’re not multi-tasking, you’re actually serial-tasking, rapidly switching your focus from one thing to another. The constant back-and-forth can make tasks take up to 40 percent longer, can adversely affect how you learn, and according to a University of London study, can rob you of about ten IQ points. That’s about what you lose when you miss a whole night’s sleep, and more than twice what you lose after smoking pot. Lesson: Modern society is like a whole world full of potheads. Explains a lot, no?

Your brain can only truly multitask in two situations: One of the things you’re doing is so familiar that it’s automatic, which is why you can chew gum and play accordion (assuming you play accordion) or the things you’re doing use different types of brain processing, which is why you can listen to music and drive. So if your resume boasts that you’re good at multi-tasking, go change it. Because you’re not. And it sounds wanky anyway.

Solutions:

  • On the surface, the solution is obvious: Do one thing at a time. That's not easy because most of us have become accustomed to a certain level of chaos. It might take more than one step to get from the beeping, flashing sensory overload chamber you call an office to a silent room where the gentle tap tap of your keyboard is the only sound. Build up to the silence. Wax on, wax off, young turtle.
  • Remember the bit about not doing two things that use the same type of brain processing? That’s important. If you try to write words while listening to music with words, you are doing two things that require language processing, which isn’t ideal. If you’re dead-set on listening to music while you write, you'll be more productive if you pick something instrumental or something so familiar that it turns into background noise.
  • Eliminate one task at a time until you’re down to one. Focus is like Axe body spray or a muscle; it gets stronger the more you use it. So be patient with yourself. 

Which of these brain tricks affect your writing practice the most?

About the author

Kimberly Turner is an internet entrepreneur, DJ, editor, beekeeper, linguist, traveler, and writer. This either makes her exceptionally well-rounded or slightly crazy; it’s hard to say which. She spent a decade as a journalist and magazine editor in Australia and the U.S. and is now working (very, very slowly) on her first novel. She holds a B.A. in Creative Writing and an M.A. in Applied Linguistics and lives in Atlanta, Georgia, with her husband, two cats, ten fish, and roughly 60,000 bees.

Similar Columns

Explore other columns from across the blog.

Book Brawl: Geek Love vs. Water for Elephants

In Book Brawl, two books that are somehow related will get in the ring and fight it out for the coveted honor of being declared literary champion. Two books enter. One book leaves. This month,...

The 10 Best Sci-Fi Books That Should Be Box Office Blockbusters

It seems as if Hollywood is entirely bereft of fresh material. Next year, three different live-action Snow White films will be released in the States. Disney is still terrorizing audiences with t...

Books Without Borders: Life after Liquidation

Though many true book enthusiasts, particularly in the Northwest where locally owned retailers are more common than paperback novels with Fabio on the cover, would never have set foot in a mega-c...

From Silk Purses to Sows’ Ears

Photo via Freeimages.com Moviegoers whose taste in cinema consists entirely of keeping up with the Joneses, or if they’re confident in their ignorance, being the Joneses - the middlebrow, the ...

Cliche, the Literary Default

Original Photo by Gerhard Lipold As writers, we’re constantly told to avoid the cliché. MFA programs in particular indoctrinate an almost Pavlovian shock response against it; workshops in...

A Recap Of... The Wicked Universe

Out of Oz marks Gregory Maguire’s fourth and final book in the series beginning with his brilliant, beloved Wicked. Maguire’s Wicked universe is richly complex, politically contentious, and fille...

Learning | Free Lesson — LitReactor | 2024-05

Try Reedsy's novel writing masterclass — 100% free

Sign up for a free video lesson and learn how to make readers care about your main character.