Ramona Quimby and A Head Full of Ghostbusters: When Men Write Women

On the cusp of Ghostbusters' release, now is a good time to consider when men write women versus when women write women. In a male-dominated industry, both Hollywood and the publishing world, it's common that even powerful women in fiction are written by men. In the case of Ghostbusters, writer/director Paul Feig, who has a history with female-driven stories such as Bridesmaids (2011), The Heat (2013) and Spy (2015), collaborated with Katie Dippold (Parks and Recreation) on the script.

That balance is precarious, however, and it's fascinating to bisect how women are portrayed by men and how women portray themselves. With that in mind, there's no better examples than Ramona and Her Father (1977) by Beverly Cleary and A Head Full of Ghosts (2015) by Paul Tremblay. 

Ramona Quimby is a precocious girl always getting into trouble. Over seven books she is outspoken and tends to bug her older sister Beezus, but has the best of intentions. A Head Full of Ghosts bears superficial, but provocative, similarities to the fourth book in the series, Ramona and Her Father. Told from the point of view of eight-year-old Merry Barrett, it follows her family as 14-year-old sister Marjorie exhibits signs of mental illness that are misinterpreted as demonic possession. Or are they? The family agrees to a reality show and tragedy ensues, while 15 years later Merry attempts to reconcile her past and present self. 

Even when men and women work together, like with 'Ghostbusters', to tell a story about women that isn’t necessarily a women’s story, they face the ire of a fan base that sees invisible strings being pulled.

Cleary was inspired by her work as a children's librarian and the insistence by young children that they couldn't find relatable characters in books.Tremblay, by contrast, is very different from Cleary. He has a master's degree in mathematics, taught high school and coached junior varsity basketball. Although he worked with children, he certainly has never been an adolescent girl. 

So what do the authors and their works have in common, and what does this have to do with Ghostbusters? First of all, there's the sisters and their age difference. Their dynamic is comparable, as well, as is the family power structure with the struggling dad and frustrated mother. But there is the little matter of genre, of course, and intended audience with Ramona and Her Father aimed at middle schoolers and A Head Full of Ghosts very much for adults.

And there's the question of “allies”. When it comes to feminism, men who fight for women's rights are considered allies, but it's a fine line. When does it become patronizing?

There's no denying that there's a feminist heart in both Ramona and Her Father and A Head Full of Ghosts, but the difference is one is unintended while the other is very purposeful. It's not to say that Cleary couldn't have considered herself a feminist. It was, in fact, a household term by 1913. But when first writing the books there wasn't a political agenda. Instead the powerful themes arose from simply telling an inspirational and aspirational story for young girls. Tremblay, meanwhile, confronts sexuality and patriarchal control, especially from religious authority, accompanied by a covert meta-commentary by modern-day Merry.

Ramona as feminist icon seems a stretch, but take it from one of the best modern female writers, Amy Poehler, in the 2016 re-release of Ramona Quimby, Age 8 (1981): “In today’s world, where people are always searching for ‘strong female characters,’ Mrs. Cleary was ahead of her time. Ramona was a pest! She was irascible and uncompromising! She was allowed to be angry and was not afraid to stand up to boys!” This highlights how important the character has been for generations of women and that importance stems from Ramona being portrayed as a person.

That humanity shines through in the failings of Cleary’s characters. There isn't much of a driving plot in Ramona and Her Father so much as episodic vignettes reflective of changing times. “The social upheaval of the 1960s,” says Anita Silvey in The Essential Guide to Children’s Books and Their Creators (2002), “had a dramatic impact on middle-level fiction.” That is dramatized in the throughline of her father getting laid off and her mom having to get a job and the resulting problems: broken-down car, home-renovation loan, unpaid mortgage, a bad smoking habit and depression from having to do housework. And Cleary’s greatest strength is, as Laura Vanderkam puts in her 2010 article “Ramona and the Middle-Class Squeeze”, “her complete lack of sentimentality as she wrote one of the best portrayals, ever, of an American family’s wrenching journey into the modern economy.” 

And that’s exactly what was going on during the 1973-1975 recession that informs the book, but Cleary doesn’t lose her young protagonist’s perspective amidst the very adult concerns. Take, for instance, her role as a sheep in the school Christmas pageant. This ties into how her mom’s job cuts into time to sew the costume, and Ramona is forced to wear pajamas instead. But ultimately it’s about little victories: the sheep steal the show, and the family finds happiness. It’s that everyday courage that is at the heart of Cleary’s unsentimental writing, as her characters accept their limitations and embrace what life hands them.

Tremblay takes a very different tack, however, with A Head Full of Ghosts. It’s remarkable how similar the Barrett family is to the Quimbys, to the point it can’t be a coincidence. John Barrett loses his job at a local factory, and although wife Sarah is able to keep the family afloat with a bank teller’s salary, that all falls apart when Marjorie shows signs of schizophrenia. After regular visits with a psychiatrist fail to effect change, John, who has rediscovered his Catholic faith, brings a priest in to see Marjorie and it’s decided that an exorcism will be performed. Word travels to higher-ups who get them the reality show The Possession, and the pieces are in place for a dark and twisted tale.

So there’s the sisterly relationship and the financial situation. The father losing his job is indicative of the Great Recession, a demonstration of how time is a flat circle, and his role as breadwinner getting shifted to the mother is also fascinating in how things haven’t changed much since the 1970s. Merry’s perspective and behavior is not unlike Ramona, as well, as she’s rambunctious and prone to dominate situations, and a bit of a tomboy with her love of soccer and shows about hunting Bigfoot.

Obviously where A Head Full of Ghosts differs from the Ramona series is in its horrific elements. It’s not so much that Tremblay lifts from Cleary’s work as Cleary established a template that has influenced fiction about the young girl experience ever since. So the closeness of the two sisters that is concurrent with their combative drifting apart as Marjorie develops into a teenager can’t help but homage Cleary, that’s how ingrained Ramona is on the collective unconscious.

But like its other obvious templates, Charlotte Perkins Gilman's “The Yellow Wallpaper” and The Exorcist, A Head Full of Ghosts critiques how men chalk up women’s feelings to “hysteria” and also uses demonic possession as a metaphor for everything from puberty to blossoming sexuality to parents fearing an uncontrollable next generation. A Head Full of Ghosts subverts The Exorcist, however, by placing the point of view firmly in the female corner, with Marjorie questioning the actions of her father and the priests, and Merry providing both the young girl and more mature perspective. As Tremblay puts it in an interview with Bull Spec:

I don’t know if you can call it a sub-plot or a sub-theme, but I really wanted to address the history of horror, and some of its bad history – in particular, the exorcism/possession story, which on a lot of levels is very misogynistic, and I wanted to try to have a feminist or a woman’s viewpoint, and to talk about, for example, the sexualization of a 14 year old girl. Which is essentially what happens in The Exorcist and a lot of other possession movies. Just the idea of the literal patriarchy – religious white men come in and save the little girl who can’t help herself.

So Cleary writes from her life experience and the consequence is natural and subtle in its encouragement of young girls. Tremblay, on the other hand, indicts hegemonic institutions, from the impotent posturing of fathers to the ineffectual  advice of psychiatrists, from the opportunistic scheming of priests to malevolent advice from thinly-veiled Westboro baptists. He wants to be an ally, even namedropping the likes of feminist scholar Laura Mulvey (”Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”) in adult Merry's blog. But he also tears a rift between Marjorie and Merry, with the former manipulating her sister into a horrible act. There can be no strong female bonds here, only shattered childhoods and a yearning for familial connection.

So where does that leave Ghostbusters? Only what can be gleaned from the previews, the press and history. On the last point, Feig started off creating shows like Freaks and Geeks, with powerful female characters like Lindsay, but also writing books like Superstud: Or How I Became a 24-Year-Old Virgin (2005), very much about his experiences as a man. Being a feminist ally, if one can interpret the last five years of his cinematic output as such, is something he’s come to late. The movie itself doesn’t look to avoid jokes about their femininity but it also doesn’t lean into them (unless you consider a proton pack blast to a ghost’s crotch as pandering to women).

It is strange that this is where many have chosen to take their stand. 2016’s Ghostbusters is more likely than not the confluence of random events, namely Paul Feig’s tendency to work with a certain group of actresses (Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig) and their popularity at the moment. Also, as Feig puts in an interview with Wired, ‘But I thought if I could cast all the funny women I know, it would be a nice way to avoid comparisons to the original iconic cast—so you’re not saying, “Oh, is that character supposed to be Venkman?”’

The movie wasn’t conceived with an ax to grind, but instead reflects inherent stereotypes. Namely, that a movie like Ghostbusters (1984), with four male leads, is just a movie while Ghostbusters (2016) with four female leads is a “female movie”. Likely Feig and Dippold didn’t ask for this fight, but faced with unavoidable knee-jerk reactions from the public they’re damned if they do, damned if they don’t.

There’s no easy answer. Cleary spent 40 years of her life writing a relatable, one-of-a-kind character that young girls could look up to, but without an overt political message. Tremblay tackled head-on the hypocrisies of man’s world, but his cynicism leads to a nihilistic message that all people, even sisters, will betray one another. And even when men and women work together, like with Ghostbusters, to tell a story about women that isn’t necessarily a women’s story, they face the ire of a fan base that sees invisible strings being pulled.

Cleary bore the weight of feminism by leading by example while Tremblay’s support deals it a blow. Ghostbusters, however, is more than likely just a fun time at the movies with the bad luck of people’s assumptions hyping it up as something it’s not.

Bart Bishop

Column by Bart Bishop

A professor once told Bart Bishop that all literature is about "sex, death and religion," tainting his mind forever. A Master's in English later, he teaches college writing and tells his students the same thing, constantly, much to their chagrin. He’s also edited two published novels and loves overthinking movies, books, the theater and fiction in all forms at such varied spots as CHUD, Bleeding Cool, CityBeat and Cincinnati Magazine. He lives in Cincinnati, Ohio with his wife and daughter.

To leave a comment Login with Facebook or create a free account.


Jose F. Diaz's picture
Jose F. Diaz from Boston is reading Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel July 15, 2016 - 11:14am

I really like this essay. It's great. My only concern is to turn Tremblay into a "feminist ally" and not just call him a feminist.

Feminism is about women, but it no longer only about women. It is now about bodily difference, or at least that has been my education and belief on the matter.

Though, I don't think this point changes the essence of the essay at all. It's just something that caught my eye.

I do write stories with strong female leads, and I think you are 100% correct, and that I do it with purpose as opposed to it being a natural expression. I am deliberately making a point that women, people with bodily differences, people with differing genders and sexuality, all find themselves in similar situations.

Can someone write a story with main characters having bodies that differ from the author and it not become a deliberate point of contestation?

Joshua Chaplinsky's picture
Joshua Chaplinsky from New York is reading a lot more during the quarantine July 15, 2016 - 12:22pm

Man, when I was a kid, I LOVED Beverly Cleary, including the Ramona books. Never once occured to me that they were "for girls."

Gerd Duerner's picture
Gerd Duerner from Germany is reading Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm July 16, 2016 - 12:31am

I got to admit that he lost me when he says "The Exorcist" was about "the sexualization of a 14 year old girl" - I rather thought it was about the repressive Catholic Church and a guy getting over his Mother complex in the course of saving a child from demonic possession - but then, my generation doesn't have any history with actual believe in demonic possessions, far as I can tell.

Nor I'm sure if that part of the genre is any more mysoginistic than the rest of it, it just seems that strongly "religion" based horror lends itself more readily to the horny leerers in the field.

Bart Bishop's picture
Bart Bishop from Cincinnati, OH July 16, 2016 - 4:22am

@ Jose: I appreciate it! When it comes to terminology, I do consider myself a feminist but also try to be careful to not appropriate other group's positions. I feel like there's a fine line between trying to help and a male feminist telling a female feminist how to be a better feminist. Basically I see these terms as a start, not an end, and try to use them to open up conversation. Also I may just be outside my wheelhouse, but I'm open to anyone broadening my horizons!

As for your last question, I often wonder that. I read a lot of Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles when I was younger and although I enjoyed them it never felt like Lestat et al spoke/thought with masculine voices. Even arguing that gender is fluid, the characters always came across as Rice writing them as binaries (when Lestat's mother Gabriel, for instance, starts dressing as a man, it's specifically framed as her acting like a man) but not quite capturing men.

I don't know. All I know as a straight white male all I can do is be open to other perspectives.

Bart Bishop's picture
Bart Bishop from Cincinnati, OH July 16, 2016 - 4:26am

@ Joshua: I read the Ramona books, too! That's why I remembered them enough that they occured to me when reading A Head Full of Ghosts. 

I think part of what I meant with the article was Cleary was just writing a strong young girl without there being any motive other than children needing someone to relate to. But part of that easy relatability, without many other options, is what led to Poehler stating that Ramona was an icon for little girls. 

She can be for both boys and girls! But maybe it's like a 70/30 thing?

Bart Bishop's picture
Bart Bishop from Cincinnati, OH July 16, 2016 - 4:29am

@ Gerd: Can't it be all of the above in terms of sexual awakening, repressive Catholic Church and a man getting over his mother?

I mean, there is the whole crucifix masturbation scene. And Regan being in a bed. And a lot of the cognitive dissonance comes from a little girl saying sexually charged things like, "Your mother sucks cock in hell!" 


PuppyLover's picture
PuppyLover from Slovenia July 20, 2016 - 11:19pm

- The movie sucks, and it's not because a man wrote the female characters, it's because the movie isn't funny, and is almost a SNL parody of the original Ghostbusters and a cash grab on an established franchise.

- Every single male character in the movie is an idiot and/or stereotype.

- The movie got pre-release hate because the trailer was god awful not anything else.

Also, the stuff about The Exorcist made me cringe hard.

selenem's picture
selenem from Ontario, Canada is reading The Cider House Rules, by John Irving July 23, 2016 - 12:40am

I found this article to be poorly reasoned. While I enjoyed the Ramona books, I don't find they inform me as a woman or a feminist reader and writer. 

First off, Tremblay has stated that he never read Ramona and her Father, so it's not a good novel to compare. He was writing from his own experience of his own father being laid off. 

Second, you should have left Ghostbusters out of the article entirely if you haven't seen the movie. 

Third, you should have chosen a GROWN UP book to write about, written by a woman. Or couldn't you think of any? 

If you don't know of any female horror authors to compare, then I think there's a larger problem here than just apples and oranges. 


Bart Bishop's picture
Bart Bishop from Cincinnati, OH July 23, 2016 - 3:12am

"It’s not so much that Tremblay lifts from Cleary’s work as Cleary established a template that has influenced fiction about the young girl experience ever since."

Sorry this wasn't your cup of tea.

Amelia Gormenghast's picture
Amelia Gormenghast July 24, 2016 - 3:54pm

I think your article is weakened without finding an actual horror story written by a woman to bridge some of the gaps. I liked it as a piece talking about the enduring influence of Ramona Quimby, but then it fell apart.

I don't think a decision to write about betrayal and tragedy is inherently anti-feminist. If I'm going to be convinced otherwise I want to need to see a horror story, about sisters, for adults, AND by a woman that bridges the gap. Then there'll be a clearer, and probably more nuanced description, of the way gender can influence horror writers. A way to account for the obvious differences between writing horror fiction and excellent children's literature.

Molly Tanzer, Kelly Link, and Deborah Kalin have written stories of varying kinds of sisters and siblings. So have plenty of other women. But the obvious choice to include here would be We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson. It was more of a template for Head Full of Ghosts than anything except maybe the Exorcist. I'd be a lot happier reading a thoughtful comparison that included a discussion of Jackson's work. Did she also write a story of betrayal? Is there more honestly in her sisters' actions? Is this the inherently feminist part?


Bart Bishop's picture
Bart Bishop from Cincinnati, OH July 25, 2016 - 5:26am

@Amelia, I respect what you're saying, but part of the point of the article was to contrast two extreme points of the spectrum.

Perhaps I don't entirely succeed, but comparing two horror novels would have been a little too obvious. I was trying for a ridiculous dichotomy to challenge myself.

Also I thought it would be fun! Bear in mind, I consider writing an article for online to be a start, not an end. This can be an evolving thing in the comments, since I'm willing to discuss it with people who add their thoughts and opinions.