Hobbit Premiere Overshadowed by Protests and Allegations of Animal Cruelty

Peta alleges 27 animals killed while making 'The Hobbit'

New controversy has erupted over the imminent release of the first movie in Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit trilogy - primarily over accusations that the production company behind the films is responsible for more than two dozen animal deaths.

With the New Zealand premiere just days away (it opens there on the 28th) and companies like Air New Zealand hoping to capitalize on the excitement surrounding the film, the allegations couldn’t come at a worse time.

Jackson and his press team have leapt into action and released a statement:

'Extraordinary measures were taken to make sure that animals were not used during action sequences or any other sequence that might create undue stress for the animals involved,' Jackson has said, going on to point out that more than half of the shots of animals in the film were computer-generated.

To complicate matters, the ‘animal wranglers’ who worked on the film have admitted that no animals were harmed during filming - they are, however, blaming the production company for deaths of sheep, chickens, goats and horses that were kept at a nearby farm. And they’ve got People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) on their side, the main group behind the protests planned for New Zealand, the US and Britain. They’re also calling for full CGI in all scenes where animals are involved.

In response, Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema also put out a statement, saying the allegations

can be traced to freelance animal wranglers who were dismissed by the production over a year ago.

So, unless Peta can produce proof to back up their accusations, it’s unlikely to be cleared up before the premieres, but is it likely to affect the number of people going to see The Hobbit? I’d say probably not.

And as they say, no publicity is bad publicity. Even protests.

Image of The Hobbit or There and Back Again
Author: J. R. R. Tolkien
Price: $9.05
Publisher: Mariner Books (2012)
Binding: Paperback, 300 pages
Dean Fetzer

News by Dean Fetzer

Dean Fetzer is originally from a small town in eastern Colorado, but has lived in London, England, for the past 21 years. After a career in graphic design, he started a pub review website in the late 90’s; He left that in 2011 to concentrate on his thriller writing, as well as offering publishing services for authors, poets and artists. When not writing - or in the pub - he can be found in the theatre, live music venues and travelling.

To leave a comment Login with Facebook or create a free account.

Comments

Ruxandra Buture's picture
Ruxandra Buture November 26, 2012 - 10:38am

I actually know a lot of people (including myself) that aren't going to see it because of this! No matter how much i want to.. sigh. 

Joshua Chaplinsky's picture
Joshua Chaplinsky from New York is reading Stories of YOUR Life November 26, 2012 - 10:46am

But is boycotting actually going to accomplish anything? And it's not like these deaths were wide scale or malicious. Wouldn't it be better to have a constructive dialog with the involved parties about how things can be improved instead of witch hunting? Why deprive yourself of hobbity goodness?

Brandon's picture
Brandon from KCMO is reading Made to Break November 26, 2012 - 10:50am

Man, I really hate to bring this up, but The Dark Knight Rises had a record-breaking opening despite the Aurora shootings.

I highly doubt these allegations will hurt The Hobbit's numbers.

David Saltzman's picture
David Saltzman from Madison, WI is reading The Hydrogen Sonata, by Iain M. Banks November 26, 2012 - 11:03am

I really think "overshadowed" is a bit strong.  Not only is it PETA, which has no legitimacy whatsoever, but there's no actual proof of any wrongdoing or malicious intent.  They protest EVERYTHING.  This will not hurt the box-office return at all--nor should it, since there's nothing to show anybody did anything wrong.  The very worst-case scenario is that freelance wranglers let animals die, and were then dismissed by the production team.  How was this supposed to be handled differently?  Their goal is to have no animals used in any way by anybody; that's not feasible, and failing to meet that benchmark doesn't denote animal cruelty.