Has anyone ever workshopped an entire novel? On LitReactor or elsewhere?
I've started to do it and it's been useful, but I'm getting to the point where multiple protagonists will take the story in different directions. I want a few reviews, so have to keep my chucks in the 2-4,000 word range, but if I followed the chronology of the book, I'd just have people reviewing incomplete scenes because I jump between storylines.
If I workshopped each character's scenes individually with brief descriptions of what would happen elsewhere in the novel, do you think that would work? So I say, "Detectives are briefed on the case"; then I have a scene where the killer is preparing to attack someone; then I say, "Detectives interview an expert"; then I have a scene where the killer is following someone (these are just examples, not spoilers, just in case you want to do a review. Hey, did I mention I'm workshopping this? Have you seen the chapters in the workshop? Oh, I just thought I'd mention it...)
I'm using the structure that I've chosen to build tension - you can see the detectives are on the trail, but maybe they're still far behind, and then the killer is getting ready to go again, then the detectives get a lead and so on.
Any thoughts welcome.
Yes, I used to belong to Write Club, which was a year-long novel workshop. And my biggest challenge, aside from how slowly I write—they'd only get about one chapter per month—was dealing with multiple/nonlinear narratives. I didn't want to actually write the book in the order the chapters would appear, but felt compelled to so that my workshop peers could judge the book by the same chronology the end reader would experience. One thing that helped was to create a thread (in your case, maybe a document?) of running chapter summaries each time I posted a new one, so they could refresh themselves on what happened before.
I can't speak to how LR wokshoppers might prefer you handle this. But I would guess if you're a pretty fast writer you might be able to write the book as-is and they could keep track, but otherwise, the method you suggested sounds doable. One thing, though, who's to say the same reviewers will be reading each story since they're all separate threads? (I think.) Maybe you could solicit some specific people willing to follow you for the entire journey. (Is there any novel-reviewing component to the LR workshops?) One advantage of Write Club is I had the same three or four reviewers locked in for a year.
Would it not be advantageous to have an entire first draft written before entering into this sort of thing?
Thug: for LR, I would think so. But in Write Club, that was one of my peeves, when members would come in and drop a novel on us, even in pieces. I would feel like the feedback I was providing wasn't being heeded when I'd see the same mistakes and tendencies repeated over and over because it was already written. I wanted to see them evolve over the course of the year as they incorporated those lessons-learned.
I did Write Club chapter by chapter and I enjoyed learning that way. The guy I worked with did his in 2-3 chapter chunks (they were short chapters) and yes, in an environment like that it would be frustrating to have the whole thing done. Part of the idea of a thing like that is to have a relationship with the people looking at your stuff where they know your weaknesses and strengths -- you get about half way done and all the little bullshit is gone and your critiques focus on the bigger picture.
I've never workshoped a pre-written novel online. I did this once in an in-person writer group but it was so long ago, I don't even remember most of those people's names let alone what worked or didn't work for me in the process.
Sure, count me in. I've got a raw first draft novel done, and my resolution for 2014 is to get a good polished 2nd draft finished.
Maybe in Write Club people should have a first draft done, then do the rewrite as the year progresses...
Yeah, I've definitely seen that a few times, and seems to work well. They get more out of it, because they can post chapters faster and probably have a third draft by year's end, as opposed to many who don't even get their first one done in that time. I workshopped the same novel two years in a row and was still only 60% done. That frustrated some readers, so I ended up posting all my remaining chapter synopses so they could at least see how it would end. Actually, I think I did that in the middle of the second year because I was getting annoyed by certain pieces of feedback that were a result of them not understanding my intentions of how I was working up to reveal a big twist.
Is there any reason not to post the entire first draft at once in Write Club?
Etiquette. The unwritten expectation is to post a chapter/section at a time. Goes back to what I was saying about the madness of pointing out the same mistakes/tendencies over and over because there's no progress seen/made during that time. That, and you could be waiting many months to get feedback on a document that large (given that most reviewers would expect to be providing about that same amount of feedback over the course of an entire year). I've edited books for friends before, and even with somewhat-focused attention, that's weeks of work.
Now, I suppose you could say, "Read this draft quickly without making any line-level comments, and just give me some big-picture thoughts at the end and suggestions for improvement," and work from there. I personally couldn't do that, though. Mainly because I can't stand reading unpolished work. That results in so many "yeah, but"s that I'm pointing out, things they probably knew they needed to fix anyway, wasting both of our time. Me, I only want to read something after they've already made it the best they possibly can, where my suggestions would be most beneficial. Unless the story's fucked at some fundamental level, in which case having polished it was a huge waste of their own time. hahaha So, yeah, diff'rent strokes, your mileage may vary, yadda.
Gordon, I came upon this thread and tried to reserach this Write Club that's mentioned. All I found was an in-person group that meets in a few major cities. Am I looking at the correct "Write Club?" I got the impression from this discussion it was on-line, but maybe I'm wrong.
It's online, but it's a private forum (to safeguard against "prior publication" among other things). Signup is usually in November-ish, by word of mouth, and then it locks down before the beginning of each year. I think there are probably lots of clubs/sites that use that name; no affiliation. I believe Renee Pickup is the admin this year, if I remember correctly.
What, if anything, would you say is the difference between a write club and beta reading?
What are points?
How might one go about "auditioning" for this Write Club? I heard about it on the Booked podcast and it is very intriguing.
Renee up there ^^ could probably tell you. Usually it opens up in November-ish to get ready for the following year. I was in it for several years; not sure how they're handling it at the moment as things evolve.
Also: Booked, woot!
Hey! you had an interview on there. I am years late but I am about to get my claws on a copy of of Warmed & Bound. Cant wait.
Can't go wrong with that book; it's excellent. Enjoy!
And yep, they interviewed me for episode #33, featured a clip from a reading in #68, and reviewed my novel Flashover in #89.
Write club still open?
Let's see if I get everyone's questions...
Gordon, I came upon this thread and tried to reserach this Write Club that's mentioned. All I found was an in-person group that meets in a few major cities. Am I looking at the correct "Write Club?" I got the impression from this discussion it was on-line, but maybe I'm wrong.
Wrong Write Club. I know someone who got as far as signing up with the Write Club you're talking about before realizing it wasn't the right thing. It's a fully online, private forum. And yes, I am one of the admins this year.
What, if anything, would you say is the difference between a write club and beta reading?
A two way relationship. With beta-readers, you write it all out, they read it. With WC you're giving and taking which means you and your partners know each other's strengths and weaknesses, and you go through your work over a longer length of time.
How might one go about "auditioning" for this Write Club? I heard about it on the Booked podcast and it is very intriguing.
It's not all that crazy. You have to be invited, so look out for people who are in (hey, I'm in, you see me, right??), then you have to provide a synopsis of your novel. As Gordon mentioned, invitations usually go out in November, registration starts in December, and we get to work in January. So around the end of the year is the time to keep your ears perked.
Write club still open?
Short answer: No. Longer answer: see above.
Kind of wish this discussion had started in Nov/Dec. we were trying to recruit pretty hard as a lot of the old guard has sort of graduated from the WC format.
Thanks for chiming in, Renee!
Yeah, a big part of workshopping is learning what feedback to ignore. Taking everyone's suggestions is both exhausting and often counterproductive. But it's hard to discount a consensus, so those carry more weight. Me, I've always been better at pointing out nuts-n-bolts stuff at the line level, and tend not to be as critical of big-picture plottings and thematic stuff. Which is also why I always appreciated the latter type of feedback more in my own work. And why the replies in the threads themselves are so important (as opposed to just their doc attachments), to hopefully spark some discussion between reviewers who probably aren't seeing what's in others' docs, getting consensus and reinforcing or negating certain things.
It seems like it would be more productive to workshop a short story collection that happens to have a linear progression with the same characters story by story, than a novel then. One of the more destructive things I've noticed in myself, is trying to edit as I go if I try to stick to the same seven point structure throughout the book.
