I was reading a piece by some author recently that made me realize how much online customer reviews (mainly of books, but the same applies to many products) have really affected our lives. Most of my hardcore reading has taken place in the internet era, so I hadn't thought much about this before. Of course I was aware of the evolving relationships between authors and readers, and how accessible it's become for some, having participated in and benefitted from both ends of that. It used to be that you published a book and some newspapers or zines might review it professionally, and that's all the feedback the author (and potential readers) would get, aside from personal conversations and whatnot. You birth it out into the world and that's the end of it.
Now, some total stranger from New Zealand can share their thoughts with the world, not just on the seller's site, but in their social networks as well. Benefitting curious readers as much as its author. Which can be either a beautiful or maddening thing, maybe even have some impact on future work. I used to think that if only the right person of influence would read one of my books and broadcast kind things about it, that would be the key to success. But the reality is probably more grassroots than that.
All that said, if you've ever read my stuff, I would sincerely appreciate any thoughts posted to those channels. My ratio of reviewers to readers is shockingly low, and every little bit helps. I think.
Your 2nd post there - I agree with every word. And it sucks becuase sometimes it's just the author's excitement about their hardwork finally seeing the world. But you know what they say about first impressions.
And I already gave you a review G! When I finally get around to Major Inversions, I'll hook that one up too.
I reviewed Submission Windows. I'd be happy to start a discussion on Amazon, if you wish.
Amazon bought Goodreads last year, so I'm waiting to see the functionality merge.
Also, I agree with your second post, Gordon. Nowadays, writers are way more in the public eye. They have to be. And jerk authors could turn readers off. Or really, any behavior could turn a reader off. Likeability is probably a factor in success, much moreso than it used to be.
Oh, and I discovered NetGalley the other day. Basically, you pay to make your book available to their readers and they contribute unbiased reviews. I'm not sure how I feel about the practice myself, but for someone who is willing to do whatever it takes to gain readership, it might be worth looking into.
I presume you bring up Ellis (as in Bret Easton Ellis) because I'm reading American Psycho? I have no personal experience with his Twitter persona, but I could see him being a douche. What's worse is I'm hating the crap out of this book. Might put it down.
I wonder if there's a way we could organize a "here are novels people who call LitReactor home have published, so check them out and contribute reviews" list.
*puts Flashover and Major Inversions on wishlist
I've made a post under your Submission Windows thread. I'll be glad to start a discussion, but I think it would much more effective with the alternative title that I've suggested.
Of course, if you want to stay with this title, I'll still be delighted to start the discussion.
Alan
I would consider myself kind, which might be my saving grace, because I also consider myself misanthropic. Most misanthopy stems from self hate, I believe, and so it can be "cured" with some inner healing.
A popular writer that shoots himself in the foot (Ellis) with social media, is an author that wouldn't have had that avenue a coupla moons ago. The world has always been filled with brilliant (not talking about Ellis) writers that would be considered bad people. These days, I think the smarter ones would not have such an online presence. Will Christopher Baer might be satan himself (I hear he's a nice guy), but he doesn't spread his feces all over the digital spectrum like many others. So we are left with his work to speak for him.
I value my many bad traits in ways that I wouldn't want to quell online. I think they add to my writing. Which is why I don't have a Twitter. I drunk text way too much to defile myself in that giant fish bowl.
I think a lot of authors used to aspire to offend. These days, it seems, too many bow to popular opinion. I don't read anybody's tweets, and if I did, it wouldn't be artist's I respect. I would rather have the art speak for itself. If I am a huge fan of someones fiction, and that someone turns out to be the next Hitler, I would rather be left in the dark about his opinions and personal habits.
Also, I never plan on getting rich off of my fiction, so the social media aspect doesn't matter as much. I am just happy that there is a place like this, where I can get good feedback from great authors, and hopefully give some as well.
Hell's Half Acre should be in my mailbox tomorrow. I too wish he was online in some way, just to hear his opinions on things. His insights into writing, if he cared to share them. But I am fine with him not having twitter or being on forums all the time, as it might diminish that mystique, and it would take time away from Godspeed, assuming that is ever going to happen. I found screenshots from "The Velvet" and that looks like it was a great forum, I wish I had found out about him sooner.
I get books to review through NetGalley, but I've never considered using their services because they's so expensive. I don't have those kinds of funds sitting around to sink into something that might not pay off. Personally, paying for reviews doesn't sit right with me, especially when I don't even know I'm going to get any reviews out of all that money...
In terms of social media, I think, like most things, it's a double-edged sword. Authors are now more visible than ever, and they can communicate with readers in ways impossible until very recently. This has not only created new venues for promotion and advertising but has fundamentally altered the ways readers and authors view each other. You can chat up bestselling authors on Twitter these days, hear their thoughts, get their opinions...it's very different. And it's opened up a lot of new channels for, say, self-publishers to gain a following.
On the downside, it can get pretty annoying. Some authors and publishers fall into 100% promo mode on their social media, and it's nothing but meaningless "buy my stuff" posts over and over and over. There's got to be a balance, I think, between showing off your personality and promoting your work. If you do it right, both of those things work toward the same end. If you do it wrong...you can easily turn people off.
Finally, to get back around to the main topic: reviews. Again, double-edged sword. On the one hand, you can get a wealth of feedback on your work that can convince other potential readers to buy. On the other hand, since there's no longer a review gatekeeper, you can get stuck with tons of unhelpful reviews, one-star trolls...Amazon and Goodreads have a lot of good review content, but there's also a lot of stuff on there that just wouldn't have passed the bar before the advent of "easy reviewing."
It really all comes down, I think, for a small-time author or self-publisher, to buliding a good support network, gaining a following, and successfully prompting that following to give you feedback through reviews. I think on many levels it's a good thing that the individual can have a substantial impact on book reviews. But, like all things, there are certain drawbacks.
I'd like to suggest that you visit the Amazon page for Brothers and Bones, by James Hankins. And take a look at his Facebook page too.
James is not a well known author, yet. But his three books get reviews, especially this one.
There are over a thousand reviews for Brothers and Bones I remember when I read it, I truly wanted to write a review because the book moved me deeply.
The questions is, "Why are so many people moved to write a review?" Now, part of it may be because James priced this book economically, and people wanted to share it. I know James. We met at Thrillerfest VIII, and that may be one of the reasons that I wanted to write a review. It might also be because people are motivated by his Facebook page which helps people to view him as a person.
Perhaps reviewing the reviews will help you to glean insights into how to gain reviews. Looking forward to your thoughts.