Hi Jen,
It's interesting to stumble upon this question today since I am just rejoining the LR community after a break I forced myself to take from the internet (to devote more time to my MFA work).
LR - less expensive; more open to genre fiction; you only have to read the stories that interest you; more feedback from a variety of people and in a very timely manner; flexibility to adjust your involvement based on your schedule.
MFA - higher pressure (it's much harder to skip a deadline and/or write a so-so story if you are submitting it on the internet vs. when you have to sit in a classroom of people dissecting it); face to face interaction and socializing with people in your area; constant, longer-term involvement with the same group of writers.
So that's my two cents (if it's even worth that much). I can't vote because I love them both.
I don't know what an MFA is (masters of fine arts? people dont actually do that, do they?), so I am using this opportunity to compare punk/hardcore bands who are named with acronyms:
TSOL vs MDC?
SOD vs MOD?
COC vs DRI?
SNFU vs ... just kidding, SNFU fucking rules.
"I'm more than aware we all have different agendas, but as many are pointing out, you can't answer "which is better" without a lot of qualifiers."
Exactly.
And then she says this: "Better for the individual as a whole. If a writer wants to teach, then MFA. If a writer doesn't have the time and money, LitReactor. It just depends on what the writer is aiming for."
Jen, don't you think we know that?
I don't think you know the agenda of your own thread. It exists for the sake of itself, and therefore, is more like art. We should all just look at the thread and talk about what feelings it evokes.
